In a dramatic turn of events within Nigeria’s legal and political landscape, a court has ordered the Inspector General of Police (IGP) to arrest and produce the Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) over allegations of contempt. This rare move underscores rising tensions between the judiciary and the nation’s electoral body, raising serious questions about institutional accountability and the rule of law.
Background & Context
This is not the first time such an order has been issued against INEC’s leadership. In 2018, a similar directive came from the Federal High Court in Abuja, when the INEC Chairman was ordered to be arrested for failing to appear in a contempt proceeding.
More recently, in June 2025, the Federal High Court again moved against INEC leadership. The court directed that Form 48—a notice of consequence for disobeying a court order—be served on INEC Chairman Mahmood Yakubu by substituted means. This stemmed from a lawsuit filed by the National Rescue Mission (NRM), a political party that accused INEC of disobeying a court order requiring the commission to recognize the outcomes of an emergency convention conducted by the party.
The INEC Chairman’s alleged failure to comply with the order prompted the court to escalate the matter, authorizing the IGP to arrest and produce him in court.
Legal Basis & Mechanisms
Under Nigerian law, courts have the authority to punish for contempt when their orders are disobeyed. Form 48 serves as a warning, informing the recipient that failure to comply with a court ruling may result in punitive action. When direct service of this notice is not possible, the court may approve substituted service—such as delivering the notice through staff or posting it at an office.
If the individual still fails to appear or comply, the court may issue a bench warrant for arrest. In this case, by calling on the IGP to enforce the order, the court is asserting its authority and signaling the seriousness of the alleged defiance.
Implications & Stakes
1. Judicial Authority vs. Institutional Independence
The situation tests the limits of judicial authority over independent constitutional bodies. While INEC is tasked with maintaining electoral integrity and autonomy, no institution is above the law. The order challenges INEC to respect judicial processes or risk undermining its own credibility.
2. Precedent for Public Officials
Should the IGP execute the arrest, it could establish a strong precedent: court orders must be obeyed, regardless of office or status. Conversely, failure to act could signal selective application of justice.
3. Role of the Police
The police force, under the leadership of the IGP, holds a critical role in enforcing judicial orders. Whether or not the IGP complies with this directive will reflect on the institution’s commitment to rule of law. Delays or refusal could lead to further legal complications or institutional standoffs.
4. Political Sensitivities
Given the sensitive role INEC plays in Nigeria’s democracy, particularly with regard to elections and political party recognition, any legal action involving its Chairman is bound to be politicized. How this plays out in public discourse could affect confidence in both the judiciary and INEC.
Challenges Ahead
- Due Process: It is essential that the INEC Chairman is given the opportunity to respond legally. His legal team may file motions to set aside the order or challenge the process through appellate courts.
- Implementation: There could be bureaucratic or political resistance to the arrest, especially if the order is viewed as extreme or disruptive to INEC’s operations.
- Public Reaction: If the court’s move is seen as heavy-handed or politically motivated, it could spark public backlash or be interpreted as interference in electoral matters.
What to Watch
- Whether the IGP complies with the court order, and the timeline for any action taken
- INEC’s legal response and whether the Chairman appears in court voluntarily or contests the order
- Statements or involvement from key political figures, civil society organizations, and legal bodies
- Broader implications for future interactions between the judiciary and electoral bodies
Conclusion
The court’s order for the IGP to arrest the INEC Chairman marks a critical moment in Nigeria’s evolving democratic and legal landscape. At stake is not just the authority of a single court order, but the broader principle that even the most powerful public institutions must answer to the rule of law. As the situation unfolds, Nigerians will be watching closely to see whether justice is served—or sidestepped.
By
